The Residents of Park-Extension Oppose the New Project

Introduction

The residents of Park-Extension (Park-Ex) are currently facing a controversial project implemented by the borough mayor without proper consultation. This project has sparked strong opposition from the community, which is primarily composed of immigrants and minorities. Residents are denouncing a lack of transparency and an absence of proper studies to justify the changes, and they are calling for legal actions and protests to contest the project.

Parking Issues

Residents of Park-Ex are particularly concerned about parking issues. Despite the city’s suggestions to park their cars a few blocks away, such as at Jarry Park, residents report that this is not allowed. This restriction creates a difficult situation for many families, especially in a community where several families may share the same apartment and have multiple cars registered at the same address.

Appeal to Politicians

Park-Ex residents are also seeking to mobilize political support for their cause. They are considering contacting Justin Trudeau’s office since Park-Ex is part of his constituency, although they know that this issue falls under municipal authority. Additionally, they wish to seek the help of André Fontecilla, a deputy of Québec Solidaire, to combat gentrification and find solutions together.

Balarama Holness, a politician from the Montreal movement, is also mentioned as a potential resource. Known for gathering 15,000 signatures and recognizing systemic racism, Holness could offer valuable advice and support in this struggle.

Accusations of Systemic Racism

Residents accuse the mayor of generalizing and stigmatizing the Park-Ex community by claiming that some families own up to five cars. This statement, perceived as out of touch with reality, ignores that many apartments house multiple families, which explains the high number of registered vehicles.

They see this generalization as a sign of systemic racism, an attempt to portray this minority neighborhood negatively. Residents recall that, thanks to Balarama Holness’s efforts, systemic racism was recognized by Mayor Plante, and the police issued a public apology. Residents are calling for recognition and action against these prejudices, highlighting that the cyclists for whom these changes are being made do not pay insurance or registration.

Ombudsman Intervention

Residents also question the role of the Montreal ombudsman in this matter. They wonder how municipal officials can bypass true consultation with local citizens before imposing their will on the public. The role of the ombudsman, Nadine Mailoux, as a last resort for those who feel wronged by a decision of the City of Montreal, is crucial in this situation.

Conclusion

The residents of Park-Extension firmly oppose the borough mayor’s project, denouncing a lack of consultation and transparency. They are calling for collective, political, and legal action to contest these changes imposed without their consent. This community’s struggle highlights the importance of transparency, consultation, and respect for residents in urban planning. The residents’ continuous efforts to hold officials accountable and seek equitable solutions underscore the power of community action.